Re: kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 - non graphical boot?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 - non graphical boot?
From: Simon Andrews <simon.andrews@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:08:59 +0100
In-reply-to: <loom.20081002T080225-126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <loom.20081002T080225-126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Mike wrote:

Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical boot?


It's not just you

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/462980

Anyone else who has this problem please report this in the bug to helpdiagnose this.


Simon.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 - non graphical boot?
  - From: Mike

References:
- kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 - non graphical boot?
  - From: Mike

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: FC9 Network Config]
Next by Date: Windows XP & Fedora on one computer
Previous by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 - non graphical boot?
Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 - non graphical boot?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]