Re: 32bit vs 64bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Rahul Sundaram writes:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.

You don't have to do that. Fedora by default installs nspluginwrapper which works with the 32-bit plugins on 64-bit arch. It also has the advantage of adding more stability and security (via SELinux policy) by separating the plugins into different process.

Maybe, but I was never able to get it to work. Installing nspluginwrapper didn't seem to have any effect. Flash never showed up as a registered plugin in Firefox, and there was absolutely no feedback whatsoever, regarding what the problem might be.. When you install the 64-bit distro, you can still run 32-bit apps, and some of them are even included in the 64-bit repos, like firefox.


Installing 32-bit firefox is probably the easier solution, unless you're so low on disk space that you can't afford the 32-bit libraries. You probably don't want firefox using more than 3 GB of memory at a time anyway. We include firefox.i386 in the x86-64 repos because many people prefer this solution.

The 64-bit kernel has a much easier time with memory management on boxes with 1 GB or more memory, so even if you're running 32-bit apps, it can still help with performance. If you install 32-bit, and want to go 64-bit, you'll need to do a full reinstall.

-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux