On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rick Stevens wrote: > >> Yes--especially when the release notes for F9 state in no uncertain >> terms that KDE 4.x was a work in progress and the 4.0 version included >> in F9 was a prerelease. The OP has no one to blame but himself for >> using KDE in its current state. > > I don't agree with that. We've already agreed that we aren't all going to agree on this. > I don't like the way this "bleeding edge" mantra is used > to justify what are in fact simple mistakes. It's not a justification, it is an explanation, I don't think anyone has implied otherwise. > Everyone makes mistakes; it's better just to acknowledge them, > and not pretend they are part of some great scheme of things. Again, no one has implied that not being featureful is in the grand scheme of things. > I don't think KDE-4 was ready to release. > It had too many minor problems. > They weren't that serious, just slightly annoying. That, again, is entirely up to opinion. The release likely greatly sped up the finding of these issues. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
