On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:11:57 -0500 "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here, I think a compromise is necessary. If you're running a server, I > think you're competent enough to turn of NetworkManager (it was really > crappy a few versions ago). While I think there needs to be away to > have a network connection on boot, that seems, even to me, to be low > priority. But why am I being called on to be the one who needs additional competence? Why can't NetworkManager just say, "Oh look, this machine has a static IP, let's just start networking exactly the same way it always started". As long as people have to intervene to fix things after an improvement, I don't consider it an improvement. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
