Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 25, 2008, Bjoern Schiessle <bes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Who did that port?? Linus and his team?
>> 
>> Most certainly.  I can't quite picture the GNU project putting
>> resources into the early development of GNU+Linux to make the
>> combination usable.  Linux was not perceived as a relevant kernel for
>> the GNU operating system back then.

> It seems like the FSF has at least funded the necessary rewriting: 

Yep, but that was not exactly "early".  That's what became libc.so.6,
which would put that around 1994-5, if memory serves.  By then, Linux
was already perceived as relevant and important, and I believe the
Hurd had already been shifted to lower priority.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux