On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 11:07 -0400, Jeffrey Ross wrote: > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 21:09:02 -0700, > > Jonathan Ryshpan <jonrysh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Will this also fix a similar update problem on x86_64 systems? An > >> extract from a yum log follows. The update process is bringing in > >> xulrunner-1.9-0.60.beta5.fc9.i386.rpm > >> (why?) even though a more recent version > >> xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm > >> exists on at least some repositories. A complete log of the update is > >> attached. > > > > I am still seeing that problem as of this morning. It looks like the updated > > rpm is in the repo, but the metadata for x86_64 doesn't refer to it. > > > Is there any way to work around the update problem with > xulrunner-1.9-0.beta5?? As of a few minutes ago I'm still hitting > against this dependency problem. I haven't found one. I tried downloading xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm and installing it using rpm --install --nodeps xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm only to find further difficulties when upgrading the rest of the system using yum. Unfortunately I didn't keep a record of what the difficulties were. jon -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list