On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 14:36 -0400, David Boles wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 02:40 +0930, Tim wrote: > > > > Totally agree with this. It's hard enough even figuring out what the > > various mixer controls even control. > > > It is a choice. If you, either of you, do not like it you should disable it. > But I seriously doubt that Pulseaudio will 'just go away' because you don't > like it. ;-) You misunderstand me. It's not that I dislike PA, I dislike *all* the sound systems on Linux because I don't understand them and have never seen a clear explanation of how they all fit together and what they do. It seems to me (and it isn't the first time I've made the point) that there's a gaping hole where a unified model should be. Maybe I'm just stupid but I seem to see a lot of different models with overlapping functionality and no clear relation between them. And every time someone comes up with a new architecture (like PA) we have N+1 systems where previously we had N. In fact the mixer issue isn't even related to PA since I use Kmix. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
