On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 18:09 -0400, David Boles wrote: >> Anne Wilson wrote: >> > On Friday 20 June 2008 21:09:57 Craig White wrote: >> >> My experience is that each Linux >> >> distribution has its own strengths and weaknesses and that all Linux >> >> users benefit from having options. >> > >> > Precisely. I use CentOS where I need total stability, Mandriva where I want >> > ease for technophobics and Fedora on the rest. Where else do you get choice >> > like this? >> >> >> Anne, and all KDE users. Do any of you really, and I mean really, believe that >> Fedora is responsible for the KDE 'problems'? That the KDE problems are not >> KDE's problems? That Fedora released in their ISO's a KDE that was made >> intentionally to 'break' KDE in Fedora? >> >> I know that you don't Anne ;-) This is mostly addressed at the other users >> posting in these several threads. >> >> Ok. How many of those of you that are disappointed or upset with KDE 4.x did >> any research *before* you installed/upgraded? How many of you downloaded a KDE >> Live-CD and actually tried it *before* you installed/upgraded? > > I did that so I knew what I was getting into and I don't regret it for a > moment. > > poc While I personally feel that the expectations of stability, or lack there of, were communicated to the public by the KDE team, especially considering all the discussions went on in public. However, may we could benefit from even more transparency through possibly centralized info on KDE. I have some non-Fedora projects I need to wrap up, but I will see what I can contribute towards clearer info on KDE in Fedora, because frankly, I would rather not switch to Ubuntu, or Suse. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
