Tim: >> Like we believe that... (about a company who's stated aim was to >> database everything). I think it's more of a concern what they'd do >> with it, rather than worrying *if* they'll do something with it. Anne Wilson: > The answer's simple enough. If you don't trust them, don't use it. I don't. I don't trust Google not to make use of the data, though that's not such a great concern since I am doing a lot of Google searching - they are already databasing me, to a large degree. More importantly, I don't trust some website to tell me that a site is safe, when it might not be. Nor would I rely on it warning me about some site that mightn't be safe. And I could do without any delays being added by waiting for a check. I don't like the way Firefox ends up on some other OSs. With two or three taskbars crowding out the window, and bogging the program down with further processing. Firefox's none-to-nippy, anymore, without making it do even more work. I've seen some anti-virus software, for instance, hook into the browser, and give you warnings about listings you see from Google. Google could do that themselves, when they generate results for your searches. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
