On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 18:42 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:56 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote: > > On Monday 09 June 2008 11:08:46 am linuxguy wrote: > > > I've been using Evolution as my email client since RH8. I hate it > > > because it seems to get confused if one opens up an email or changes > > > [snip!] > > > Is anyone using Thunderbird like this ? How does it compare ? How hard > > > is it to move over to it ? > > > Thanks > > > > 1) I have had the same sort of problems (and more) with Evolution > > and I got tired of it. The hard part is getting it all configured > > correctly. But even then, it is a resource hog as you mentioned, > > but what pissed me off mostly was bugs, crashes, and manually > > killing the processes when things go wrong with evo. > > > > 2) I have tried Kmail and again, it has it's own set of problems, > > one involving threads, and it is SLOW depending on your MB. > > I am using an Intel dual-proc Core-Duo w/2GB ram and it is slow > > only because it needs to sync and process each email messages > > if you enable thread support. It seems faster without threading > > enabled. By threading, I mean email threading. I LOVE the versatility > > of configuring the Fonts for each gui panes. Very nice. This is my > > current email client. As with Thunderbird, when you click on a folder, > > it is at this point where synchronization to the server gets updated and > > you have to wait until it is finished - the CPU hits hard, slowing things > > down, so you are somewhat forced to wait before beginning the next > > step. I wish that this process is done automatically, is niced, and > > happens transparently, but it is what it is. > > > > 3) I have successfully configured and tried Thunderbird and I do like it > > but it is not as versatile/configurable as Kmail, imo. I ran into trouble > > initially with configuring since it was 'different' than what I was used > > to and had to get used to the idea of 'expunge' and emtpying the 'trash', > > a two-step process. With Kmail, I just have to empty the trash but then > > I set the configuration to empty the trash on exit. Pretty minor. > > > > In all three cases above, my biggest problem was connecting to M$ exchange > > as my main email server - I had to configure exchange to ALLOW connections > > but once I got through this correctly, it all worked well. > > > > FWIW, > ---- > FWIW - I use Evolution and have used it for years and I get A LOT of > e-mail. > > The only issue I have ever had with Evolution and slow/crashing was when > I turned on 'junk mail filtering' as that tends to really drag it > down...perhaps they've improved that aspect because I haven't used it > for years. > > If I was dealing with Exchange server, I surely would be using Evolution > and the Exchange connector. > > Craig > I agree with Craig. I have never had the above problems with evolution. But I havwe never tried to manage 150,000 e-mails locally. -- ======================================================================= It's no use crying over spilt milk -- it only makes it salty for the cat. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
