Dear Max: I will answer tomorrow, because today I am not with my notebook...I forgot it at home, and I have internet only in my work. The library libnepomuk.so.4 is a link to libnepomuk.so.4.1.0 in my F9 i386. I will send you more informations tomorrow. Thanks, German. On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:10 PM, max <maximilianbianco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Germán Racca wrote: >> >> Hi Max! >> >> I upgraded from F6 to F9 from the DVD. >> Dolphin and Konqueror worked well untill last week. >> I don´t know what video drivers I´m running, but I will check it. >> I saw that /usr/lib/libnepomuk.so.4 is a link to >> /usr/lib/libnepomuk.so.4.0.1...is that right? >> How can I check the integrity of libnepomuk.so.4? >> Thank you very much!!! >> German > > Well I wasn't sure how to answer your question but I smelled a learning > opportunity so here is what I have done. Running a terminal as a regular > user : > > [x33@localhost ~]$ locate libnepomuk.so.4 > /usr/lib64/libnepomuk.so.4 > /usr/lib64/libnepomuk.so.4.0.4 > > [x33@localhost ~]$ file /usr/lib64/libnepomuk.so.4 > /usr/lib64/libnepomuk.so.4: symbolic link to `libnepomuk.so.4.0.4' > > It appears to point to a slightly different version of the file on my system > than on yours. I feel like there are a couple of possibilities here : 1. > Your running 386 system and I am on a x64 so that is why the versions are > slightly different....2. Your symlink is pointing to the wrong file, maybe > you missed an update or excluded a package from being updated and this > resulted in breakage > > There are perhaps other possibilities but you said it was working until last > week and a.) this is all that occurs to me at this moment in time, i may get > another idea later, i will let you know if so b.) these seem to me the most > likely possibilities > > Wait there is one more thing to do now that I think of it : > > [x33@localhost ~]$ rpm --query --whatprovides libnepomuk.so.4 > no package provides libnepomuk.so.4 > [x33@localhost ~]$ rpm --query --whatprovides libnepomuk.so.4.0.4 > no package provides libnepomuk.so.4.0.4 > > Color me confused here but then I did this : > > [x33@localhost ~]$ file /usr/lib64/libnepomuk.so.4.0.4 > /usr/lib64/libnepomuk.so.4.0.4: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, > version 1 (SYSV), stripped > > [x33@localhost ~]$ repoquery --whatprovides libnepomuk.so.4 > kdelibs-6:4.0.3-7.fc9.i386 > kdelibs-6:4.0.4-4.fc9.i386 > > [x33@localhost ~]$ repoquery --whatprovides libnepomuk.so.4.0.4 > [x33@localhost ~]$ > > So I am more confused now than before but its not the first time so i did > this: > > [x33@localhost ~]$ rpm -V kdelibs-6:4.0.3-7.fc9.i386 > package kdelibs-6:4.0.3-7.fc9.i386 is not installed > [x33@localhost ~]$ rpm -V kdelibs-6:4.0.4-4.fc9.i386 > package kdelibs-6:4.0.4-4.fc9.i386 is not installed > > This has not alleviated my confusion but its not surprising considering that > my rpm query told me that nothing provides the two libnepomuk files in > question, though i am still confused because they are obviously present. So > at this point I feel like I am missing something obvious or simple.....I am > on a 64bit system so maybe this is biting me somehow but I don't see it. > Well the first file libnepomuk.so.4 is a symlink so maybe nothing provides > the symlink but its created by another file to satisfy a dependency? I think > its a good guess but that's all it is , in any case I feel like something > should provide libnepomuk.so.4.0.4 but apparently not because a query tells > me that nothing does so I don't know what to tell you at this point.Now > maybe this file is part of or provided by something else but not listed by > its name or linked to another file name?. I don't have any idea at this > point. Try doing what I have done and see what results you get, I'd like to > know since it might clear up some of these ?'s I have. I can tell you that > running : "dolphin" command has the desired effect of running dolphin. > > May the force be with you. > > > > > > > > -- > If you will understand that the spiritual aspect of experience is to the > physical aspect in the same kind of relation as the water to the wave form, > I can leave you to draw up your own answer....--Sir Arthur Eddington > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- Germán A. Racca Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE Divisão de Astrofísica - DAS/CEA São José dos Campos - SP - Brasil -- TEL: 55 12 3945-7209 FAX: 55 12 3945-6811 -- http://funk.on.br/racca -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
