On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:49 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > It is important, though, to maintain the web-of-trust. It does have > legal implications, and that's why local signing is an option. I use > encryption for correspondence with one person, and for that I have to > use ultimate trust, yet I've never met him. I don't recall being required to "ultimately trust" someone to send them encrypted mail. I'd call that a foolhardy thing, too. It'd be better to set your mailer to trust people on your keyring - that affects what you do with the keys, rather than inappropriately bodging the keys, themselves. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.23.15-80.fc7 i686 i386 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
