On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 08:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:18 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Chalmers wrote: > > > What do y'all think of KDE 4? It doesn't seem to be as technical as > > > KDE 3 to me, I don't like that. The system configuration lacks > > > options, I can't figure out how to get things the way that I want > > > them, etc. I am not saying that it is not good, though. That maybe it > > > just needs more options. > > > > > > Just wondering what y'all thought. > > > > > > > IMHO, KDE4-release was underwhelming and shouldn't have been released > > until it reached feature a parity with KDE 3.5.x. > > IMO, bugs and crashes can be forgiven - but not having an option to set > > the order of applets on a panel (only added in 4.0.3?) or change the > > appearance of the panel was inexcusable. > > I think most people would put it the other way round. I can > (temporarily) live with not being able to order the panel applets, as > long as the thing doesn't crash and burn. I guess it's a matter of personal preference, then. > > Reaching feature-parity with 3.5 is going to happen faster the more > people are using it. Usage count != development speed. > Fedora is meant to be a bleeding-edge distro, so > there are always going to be some things that limp along on a wing and a > prayer. Other distros like Ubuntu are more into stability, which is why > Hardy Heron is still on KDE 3.5 (with an option for 4) and an older > kernel. I never said that F9 should have included KDE 3.5.9 instead of KDE4. Far from it. I do plan to continue using KDE4 on my rawhide machine (reporting bugs as I go along) - I am saying the in my view, KDE4 is not what-I-consider sea-worthy for my day-to-day usage. (Personal preference) - Gilboa -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
