On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 03:39 -0400, Chris Snook wrote: > It's certainly a risky way to handle a major version change, but if > you do it right, it's a lot more efficient than long, drawn-out > migrations such as the Apache 1->2 change. For Apache, the gradual > approach was necessary given all the production web servers out there Which, unfortunately, still are stuck on 1, because so many of them depend on things like CPanel which *STILL* doesn't work with 2 (or so the hosts say). -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
