> > Valent Turkovic wrote: > http://linuxtracker.org/index.php?page=torrent-details&id=2dc9caedfe087535556227a156e493815749f2c8 [1] > > Is this source reliable? Is this same as Fedora 9 that is planed to be > released on 13th of May? The corresponding SHA1SUM file has been available from a number of open mirrors for a few days now and has a good signature dated May 7 from Fedora Project, so unless these ISOs get pulled from all the mirrors and replaced by tomorrow (unlikely since it takes a few days for the mirrors to sync), yes it is. On the other hand, there are good reasons other than authenticity for waiting until release day to install - to make sure the update repos are available in case serious bugs are waiting to be fixed, and also availability of the 3rd-party repos. Livna and Freshrpms don't have *-release packages for F9 yet, and it's not clear whether Rpmfusion will be available on release day to replace either or both of them. Links: ------ [1] http://linuxtracker.org/index.php?page=torrent-details&id=2dc9caedfe087535556227a156e493815749f2c8 -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=263321&topic_id=56314&forum=10#forumpost263321 If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and/or blame andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
