Re: time lag between /sbin/ifconfig eth2 up and when interface becomes usable...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 13:39:36 -0400,
  Gautam Thaker <gthaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From my tests it appears that it takes between 4 to 6 seconds after the "up" command before my UDP packets actually start going out. The tests are between two machines with addresses 192.168.0.2 <---> 192.168.0.3.

Any hints welcome. The "/sbin/ifconfig eth2 up 192.168.0.2" command returns right away, but the interface is not ready to go for a few seconds. What can this be due to?

It might be waiting for a test to see if any other machine is using that IP
address on that subnet. The time delay seems to be reasonable for a timeout
to a whohas arp request. Looking at the network traffic should allow you
to refute this or add some more suggestive evidence that this is the cause.

I have done some investigations as suggested by Bruno. I have two machines, "a" (192.168.0.2) and "b" (192.168.0.3). These are the only two machines on the subnet.

I do the "/sbin/ifconfig up/down" in "a", and I use tcpdump to monitor what packets come thru at "b". I thought that by doing this I can answer Bruno's question if the delay is due to some "whohas arp" packets and related timeout. The trace that I capture at "b" shows this:



root@b> /usr/sbin/tcpdump -i eth4
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth4, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes

# node "a" does "ping b -c 1"
11:27:49.137672 IP a-link0 > b-link0: ICMP echo request, id 10290, seq 1, length 8 11:27:49.137695 IP b-link0 > a-link0: ICMP echo reply, id 10290, seq 1, length 8
11:27:54.137816 arp who-has b-link0 tell a-link0
11:27:54.137822 arp reply b-link0 is-at 00:04:23:b7:22:a4 (oui Unknown)


node "a" does /sbin/ifconfig eth4 down and then waits for about 30 more seconds.

node "a" does /sbin/ifconfig eth4 up 192.168.0.2   and waits...

11:28:35.045148 IP6 fe80::204:23ff:feb7:17be > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16 11:28:39.045283 IP6 fe80::204:23ff:feb7:17be > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16 11:28:43.045367 IP6 fe80::204:23ff:feb7:17be > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16

# NOTE: ABOVE SEEMS TO BE IPV6 RELATED, I WONDER IF I COULD DISABLE IPV6
# AND IF ANYTHING WOULD BE DIFFERENT. Comments welcome.

# node "a" does "ping b -c 1"  and immediately on "b" one sees:
11:28:55.521795 arp who-has b-link0 tell a-link0
11:28:55.521805 arp reply b-link0 is-at 00:04:23:b7:22:a4 (oui Unknown)
11:28:55.521944 IP a-link0 > b-link0: ICMP echo request, id 11570, seq 1, length 8 11:28:55.521956 IP b-link0 > a-link0: ICMP echo reply, id 11570, seq 1, length 8
11:29:00.521513 arp who-has a-link0 tell b-link0
11:29:00.521642 arp reply a-link0 is-at 00:04:23:b7:17:be (oui Unknown)


Bottom line, I don't know yet why after a

/sbin/ifconfig  eth4 up 192.168.0.4

it takes 5 seconds before ping traffic can actually get thru from node a to node b. Is there an RFC mandated delay someplace? (I understand networks but am not a guru.)

Gautam







--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux