was referring to users in general. - anyone who might be inclined to use Linux on the desktop, as opposed to admins and engineers who might be higher level users employing a Linux desktop.
Evidently you didn't read the whole thread. The poster before me made the lazy user comment.
--- On Thu, 4/24/08, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Tim
<ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
To: ace_wizard@xxxxxxxxx, "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008, 5:01 AM
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:29 -0700, Paul Shaffer wrote:
> Just to clarify, I don't disagree with Fedora's approach to the
> licensing and software
patent issues at all. In fact, I think it's
> quite admirable. Just maybe not the best way to build user base for a
> distro that is ostensibly for "lazy" users.
Since when was *this* distribution aimed at them? Fedora's touted as
bleeding edge, for those that want that sort of thing. Ubuntu's the one
targeted at the lazy user - the Windows user who's sick of Windows, but
doesn't realise they'd like to use a Mac. ;-)
--
(This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's
important to the
thread.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists. |
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
|
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
Try it now.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
