-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 g wrote: > Tom Poe wrote: >> G. I used the wrong term. I apologize. > > accepted. > >> There are no interference >> issues, nor are there any licensing issues. A wireless network that >> covers a 2 mile by 3 mile square area without Internet connection, is >> called an intranet. Any computer that can see the cloud, can >> communicate with all the other computers, and participate in a >> videoconference. Thus, it looks a lot like low power tv. Does that >> make sense? So, what's to keep that from happening? Is it the cost of >> the equipment for hosting a videoconference? Do you know what's needed? > > taking a break to read up on part 15. > > truth of matter, something of a similar order was considered by local lug, > but it was dismissed for various reasons. things just got interesting. part 15.247 does not really apply as i would have expected it to be. from what i have found so far, i can see that there is more to find and read. from what i have found and read, i will say this, go for it. as long as what ever system you use is within guide lines of part 15, you should be safe. i do recommend that you get full part 15 and read thru it to be familiar with what you are dealing with. in using such low power, you will be limited to near 'line of sight' coverage and you may get some degrading due to terrain, buildings and such. over all, your intent of use may be satisfied with results you want. as was said, $80 is not much to spend on such equipment. - -- tc,hago. g . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFICDJKQCGYa6nWX2MRAosSAKCI0kz+HSTbLHdH3SItiMVrnXa55gCgvT/B DTKK15oljvfp8zRsDhnVryA= =xNlD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
