g wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Poe wrote:
G. You're determined to mislead the list members. How come?
i am not misleading any one. i just believe that people should be aware of
is regulated before they get fined for illegal broadcasting.
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFICB0fQCGYa6nWX2MRAgIkAKCx3SIXjHn2naVew5UeRJzpeoN+PgCgnSZ5
xzRrhu0AN8/n9UAV5D+7e+s=
=hgew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
G. I used the wrong term. I apologize. There are no interference
issues, nor are there any licensing issues. A wireless network that
covers a 2 mile by 3 mile square area without Internet connection, is
called an intranet. Any computer that can see the cloud, can
communicate with all the other computers, and participate in a
videoconference. Thus, it looks a lot like low power tv. Does that
make sense? So, what's to keep that from happening? Is it the cost of
the equipment for hosting a videoconference? Do you know what's needed?
Tom
