Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:53:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <8843055e0803250737q5649cba0i7f527ed82fc6a779@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <64b14b300803241233t7a69b620oc6fb5f3d9f7096e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47E816BF.3040806@xxxxxxx> <8843055e0803250737q5649cba0i7f527ed82fc6a779@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)

Mauriat M wrote:

 this guy should be using RHEL if he does not want anything to change.


So RHEL is the only way someone might want to have a desktop linux
that can in some capacity act as a server. Noted.


Or CentOS, if you don't mind your updates coming a few hours later.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

References:
- Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
  - From: Valent Turkovic
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
  - From: Albert Graham
- Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
  - From: Mauriat M