Actually, CentOS 5.1 isn't that bad as a desktop. So you could probably get away
with using just one machine. The Linux desctop have come a long way, and you no
longer need to be on the bleeding edge to have a resonable set of functionality.
2008/3/24, Mauriat M <mirandam@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Valent Turkovic
> <valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > http://www.mjmwired.net/linux/2008/02/11/fedora-makes-a-terrible-server/
> >
> > What is your experience ?
>
> The general wisdom from fedora power users is:
> - Fedora for the desktop / workstation
> - CentOS for the home server or other unsupported server
> - RedHat for a serious server or otherwise when support is needed
>
> * by support I mean paid support
>
> Also, SELinux isn't nearly that hard. I wouldn't put a box on the open
> internet without SELinux.
>
Well I guess I was hoping for the best of both worlds by having my
desktop "act" as a server. Why have 2 machines when 1 will do?
Too much to ask, I know.
-Mauriat
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
