Re: Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, CentOS 5.1 isn't that bad as a desktop. So you could probably get away
with using just one machine. The Linux desctop have come a long way, and you no
longer need to be on the bleeding edge to have a resonable set of functionality.

 
2008/3/24, Mauriat M <mirandam@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Valent Turkovic
>  <valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > http://www.mjmwired.net/linux/2008/02/11/fedora-makes-a-terrible-server/
>  >
>  >  What is your experience ?
>
>  The general wisdom from fedora power users is:
>  - Fedora for the desktop / workstation
>  - CentOS for the home server or other unsupported server
>  - RedHat for a serious server or otherwise when support is needed
>
>  * by support I mean paid support
>
>  Also, SELinux isn't nearly that hard. I wouldn't put a box on the open
>  internet without SELinux.
>

Well I guess I was hoping for the best of both worlds by having my
desktop "act" as a server.  Why have 2 machines when 1 will do?

Too much to ask, I know.

-Mauriat

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux