On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 03:40 -0400, Ric Moore wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 20:32 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 23:26 -0400, Ric Moore wrote: > > > As of late, I've started getting this error: > > > yum install python-gtk > > > Loading "kernel-module" plugin > > > Loading "basearchonly" plugin > > > Loading "fastestmirror" plugin > > > Loading "fedorakmod" plugin > > > Loading "downloadonly" plugin > > > Loading "priorities" plugin > > > Loading "protectbase" plugin > > > Loading "tsflags" plugin > > > Loading "merge-conf" plugin > > > Loading "refresh-updatesd" plugin > > > Loading "allowdowngrade" plugin > > > Loading "changelog" plugin > > > Loading "protect-packages" plugin > > > Loading "presto" plugin > > > Loading "skip-broken" plugin > > > Loading "security" plugin > > > Repository fedora is listed more than once in the configuration > > > Repository fedora-debuginfo is listed more than once in the > > > configuration > > > Repository fedora-source is listed more than once in the configuration > > > Determining fastest mirrors > > > Could not retrieve mirrorlist > > > http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/7/mirrors-freshrpms error was > > > [Errno 12] Timeout: <urlopen error timed out> > > > Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: freshrpms > > > > > > So, I've looked and looked, but do not find the repos noted being listed > > > twice anywhere. And, the freshrpms thing is happening even while the > > > freshrpm repo is inactive without me enabling it. Anyone have a clue?? > > > Everything worked until a day ago. Ric > > ---- > > locating duplicated repo... > > > > # grep -l '\[fedora\]' /etc/yum.repos.d/* > > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo > > > > freshrpms... > > # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/freshrpms.repo > > [freshrpms] > > name=RPMForge: Freshrpms > > #baseurl=http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/$releasever/$basearch/freshrpms/ > > mirrorlist=http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/$releasever/mirrors-freshrpms > > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-freshrpms > > gpgcheck=1 > > enabled=1 > > priority=110 > > > > Craig > > Thanks Craig! I didn't think that the resulting *~ files left over from > an edit would still register as a valid repo file to yum. So, anything > in that directory is considered a repo file even if it has *.repo~ in > it? Weird. DOS brain between the chair and the computer at work here, > relying on an filename extension. I'll put a pic of Samantha Fox in > there to see if yum will try to use it! <grins> I'll letcha know what > happens. Ric ---- I don't think so...I think only file names that end in '.repo' are actually used. The grep command listed all files in that directory that had [fedora] in them. If you only had one file listed, it must have had the [fedora] section in there twice. Craig
