Re: Konqueror vs Firefox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
David Boles wrote:

Arthur - see if this makes any difference with Firefox for you. I does for me.

Try a site first to compare to later. Then, as 'root' edit /etc/profile
add this

export MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1

It can be anywhere but I put it just under the original export line. save and close.

Wouldn't it be better to put it in a file in /etc/profile.d? That way, it would survive an update. You should really create 2 files - firefox.sh and firefox.csh.


I had not thought of this that way. I don't do updates only clean
installs. But you could very well be correct.

I was thinking more along the lines of a setup RPM update. Depending on how it was handled, you would end up with profile.rpmsave or profile.rpmnew if you made the change in /etc/profile.

Do you know what the disadvantages of using this? Would it be worth wile to add the /etc/profile.d/firefox.[c]sh files to the Firefox package?


As I understand this, the way it was explained to me, is that Pango helps the display of the hmm... more complicated fonts. The 'double wide' fonts like Chinese characters for example and there are others. I do *not* know this but I was told that since I only use the 'single' fonts I don't really need Pango. I have not recommended this to anyone with an obviously Oriental name. :-)

As a clearly explained *option* I would think it would be an acceptable change. Might even be a good idea.

And, for those of us that a 'speed freaks', Firefox 3.0 runs circles around Firefox 2.0. IMO. ;-)

--


  David


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux