Re: wicd - better wireless network manager than NetworkManager?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Izhar Firdaus wrote:

> looking @ the screenshot, it looks more like a wrapper GUI for
> wpa_supplicant , iwconfig, and ifconfig and require user-configuration
> - and focus more for ethernet and wlans. NetworkManager in the other
> hand, is more for JustWorks(tm) with broad range of supported
> connections and features. Static IP, Connection Sharing, and several
> other cool stuff are also on the way for NetworkManager 0.7

The trouble is, NM doesn't "just work" for lots of people (including me),
as is obvious from this newsgroup/mailing list.

In my view, what is needed is a program that just deals with WiFi,
and which tells you what is wrong if the connection fails.
In my experience, NM and system-config-network (in its various guises)
are both quite bad at this.



-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux