Low level formatting - [was Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install (TRY)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:54:52 -0600
Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Low level what?  If you mean low-level formatting, I don't think that's been
possible to do with hard drives since the days of RLL and MFM.

Correct (well the very earliest days of IDE), and it wouldn't affect
performance anyway.

I can remember people killing the early IDE drives by low-level formatting. The tools for low-level formatting MFM/RLL drives would mess up the IDE drives. With later drives, they would ignore the low-level formatting attempts.

Themain reason for low-level formatting MFM/RLL drives was moving them to a new controller, or changing the interleave - nether are applicable to modern IDE/ATA drives. (It was easier to low-level format then to tweak the controller data clock to match the old controller.)

Mikkel
--

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux