Re: Root exploit in the wild

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Root exploit in the wild
From: Scott Harvanek <scotth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:14:47 -0700
In-reply-to: <47B081EC.1040200@xxxxxxx>
References: <20080210163423.b468e4e8.theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200802110955.58637.lowen@xxxxxxxx> <e8a30f560802110708q1acd9e23iff9e1569fb0d9343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080211110804.0c30f47f.theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47B081EC.1040200@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)

Michael A. Peters wrote:

Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:08:00 -0600
inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd be surprised if those systems were running kernels that are thisnew.
Why? Lots of outfits use RHEL and Centos for their serverapplications and one
assumes they would be keeping them up to date.
But a lot of them are running rhel/centos 3 or 4 - rhel 5 isn't that old.

Uh... RHEL 5 is nearly a year old...

-Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Michael A. Peters

References:
- Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Frank Cox
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Lamar Owen
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: inode0
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Frank Cox
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Michael A. Peters

Prev by Date: Re: f8 and ddclient
Next by Date: Re: Sharing printers between Fedora machines
Previous by thread: Re: Root exploit in the wild
Next by thread: Re: Root exploit in the wild
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]