Re: Root exploit in the wild

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Root exploit in the wild
From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:08:04 -0600
Cc:
In-reply-to: <e8a30f560802110708q1acd9e23iff9e1569fb0d9343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Melville Theatre
References: <20080210163423.b468e4e8.theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200802110955.58637.lowen@xxxxxxxx> <e8a30f560802110708q1acd9e23iff9e1569fb0d9343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:08:00 -0600
inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'd be surprised if those systems were running kernels that are this new.

Why?  Lots of outfits use RHEL and Centos for their server applications and one
assumes they would be keeping them up to date.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Michael A. Peters

References:
- Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Frank Cox
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: Lamar Owen
- Re: Root exploit in the wild
  - From: inode0

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 115 Doesn't Like iwl4965
Next by Date: Re: kickstart (undocumented) changes
Previous by thread: Re: Root exploit in the wild
Next by thread: Re: Root exploit in the wild
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]