> Mark Haney wrote: >> You know, there used to be a time when a post like this wasn't flame >> bait. It was either resolved in a friendly manner (and I do thank Mike >> Burger for the reply) or taken off-list to be resolved. I'm really >> rather disappointed at the vehement nature of an in ceasing portion of >> the posts ( and, indeed, replies) on this list. Bad attitudes seem to >> be becoming more and more the norm around here. > > A lot of people reckon posting the same question to different lists is > bad form. That aside, my comment was not directed at you; the people > reading this list now are not the only ones who benefit from its > contents, I often turn up answers on lists by using Google. Generally > anyone following Google to an archive of this list might not recognise > that the question's answered on another list, thinking that both > archives are the same. FWIW, that's exactly why I posted to this list that I had answered in the other...so that there would be such a reference to the other list. :-) I've been contributing to the Red Hat listserv's for way too long to just leave someone hanging in one list when I've helped in another. ;-) -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org To be notified of updates to the web site, visit: https://www.bubbanfriends.org/mailman/listinfo/site-update or send a blank email message to: site-update-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
