Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Not so well done, I was quoting from the Fedora website. It was RHEL
which I found harder to discern.
Well since you were quoting from Fedora website, that's what get the
attention.
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/features/ certainly talks about security
features and http://www.redhat.com/security/ has more information. Is
there anything in particular you were looking for?
I wasn't looking so much for security about the various products, but
what their key features are, in the view of their suppliers. Security
isn't the only desirable feature, or necessarily even the most desirable.
As I've already said, I'm fairly happy with RHEL-clones' security though
it does bite sometimes, but security is not the top concern of either
Fedora or RH.
Most (of the popular) Linux distros and the three major BSDs all do a
fine job on security, _but_ not all of them are driven by that.
NetBSD, OpenBSD and Engarde Secure linux sites mention it on their home
page.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
