Les Mikesell wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
and I note that RH doesn't highlight security at all, that's I could
find in three clicks.
http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/04/18/risk-report-two-years-of-red-hat-enterprise-linux-4/
is possibly self-serving but seems pretty realistic to me.
My point, for those who seem to have missed it, is that on the others
security is considered a top goal and highlighted as such on the home
page. I similarly excluded FreeBSD because it's not highlighted as a top
requirement. I also excluded Debian - freeness drives the Debian
project, usability drives Ubuntu.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
