On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:08:28PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Chris G wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:12:14AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > /srv > > > > > .... and how does that help? It just adds yet *another* possibility! > > > > It makes it easy to keep separate and to back it up I suppose but > > doesn't address the ease of editing or permissions issues. > > > > Is it what /srv is intended for? > > yup. > > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM > Yes, I just found my way there too and /srv does seem to be the 'most correct' place for web pages and other related things. It does seem that it's far from a well defined standard yet though which would account for the many different directories used by different distributions. Thanks for the pointer. -- Chris Green
