On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Martin Marques wrote: > Robert P. J. Day escribió: > > > > and if one were to start a new project that didn't have to be strictly > > backward compatible with anything, and one already had a decent > > grounding in CVS, subversion would also be a reasonable choice. > > Why? because subversion corrects a number of CVS "issues", and the command structure is very similar to that of CVS, so all that CVS knowledge can be transferred over fairly quickly. i didn't say that subversion was the best version control system of all the possible choices -- only that, if one was already fairly conversant with CVS, it would be a "reasonable" choice for a new project. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ========================================================================
