Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 10:26 -0800, Wallace, Brooke wrote: > Has anyone seen similar problems with the Mono package included with > fedora 8? > > We had to create a link for /usr/lib/libgdiplus.so -> > libgdiplus.so.0.0.0 since it was missing. Now we get the error below. > Should we try installing 1.2.5? Does fedora do any sanity testing of > these packages? The .so file is a -devel file and yes, we do sanity check things, just mono itself doesn't quite follow the rules. I am looking into a way to fix the problem TTFN Paul (one of the mono maintainers) -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
