On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 02:01 +1030, Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 09:01 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > We already determined that 192.168.1.6 is not the machine's address, > > I don't recall seeing a message stating what was the true cause of the > rejection.t > When the OP ran service network restart it would not restart getting an error that that ip address was already in use. That means to me that the ip address could not be asigned to the machine in question. -- ======================================================================= I profoundly believe it taip address was alreqady in use.kes a lot of practice to become a moral slob. -- William F. Buckley ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
