On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 20:38 -0700, Craig White wrote: > Thus the concept of 'users' and 'mapping', though intriguing, would be > rather pointless for an NTFS filesystem mounted by ntfs-3g Nup, I'd say it's just as valid as the user ownership in my ext3 /home partition. I could well have three people using a Linux box, and the same three people using Windows, and wanting to each own their own files, all of the time, no matter where stored. Whether ntfs-3g can manage that is another matter, but there's definitely good reasons to want seamless different user ownership across different file systems. -- (This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
