Joe Smith wrote:
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> One thing that would probably help your understanding is that [ is
>> actually a command. It is usually a shell built-in command, but it
>> is also a command in /usr/bin, and is the same as the test command.
>> ...
>
> Mmm, curious. I wonder why are they /not/ the same command?
>
> $ type [ test
> [ is a shell builtin
> test is a shell builtin
> $ ls -li /usr/bin/{[,test}
> 1234416 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31404 2007-12-05 08:25 /usr/bin/[
> 1234972 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 29032 2007-12-05 08:24 /usr/bin/test
>
> I always thought that [ and test were links to the same binary.
>
> I guess disk blocks aren't as precious as they once were ;-)
>
> <Joe
>
I do too. The last time I had checked there were the same command. I
guess I should have double checked before posting. It looks like
test was changed so you do not need the [ ]. You can use something
like "test $DISPLAY && echo DISPLAY is set." but not
"[ $DISPLAY && echo DISPLAY is set." or even [ $DISPLAY ] && echo
DISPLAY is set.". I guess the test man page needs to be updated, and
maybe a man page added for [.
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
