On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 08:52:24AM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 08:24:34AM +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Chris G wrote:
> >
> >>> My advice would be something similar: Configure by the book. Make sure
> >> What book?! :-) I think that's much of the problem, there's not
> >> much information directly related to setting up a home system as a
> >> sub-domain.
> >
> > There is nothing special about that, I've done it, Tim's done it. We both
> > use our own DNS. You don't, and that _might_ be the significant difference.
> >
> Yes, I guess it could be. Reading the O'Reilly sendmail book it does
> appear to be saying that sendmail uses DNS for *everything*. I seem
> to have a workaround at the moment though so as that works there
> doesn't seem to be a lot of point in expending a huge amount more
> effort on this.
>
> The workaround (well, discovery of what sendmail thinks 'here' is) is
> that mail sent to <user>@isbd.net from my home system gets delivered
> locally. Thus if I put:-
>
> root: chris@xxxxxxxx
>
> at the end of /etc/aliases I get root's mail. I'd dearly love to know
> *why* sendmail thinks my home system is called isbd.net but I think
> that's lost in the guts of sendmail somewhere. There is no 'isbd.net'
> anywhere in my system, the only way that sendmail can be obtaining it
> is by removing the 'home' from 'home.isbd.net'.
>
>
> Out of interest a little 'C' test program from the O'Reilly Sendmail
> book which purports to get names in the way that Sendmail does
> produces the following output on my system:-
>
> hostname = 'home'
> canonical = 'home.isbd.net'
> alias: 'home'
>
Out of interest I just copied the program to my work system (also
Fedora 7, but a different network environment of course) and there the
program produces:-
hostname = 'chrisg.atroad.com'
canonical = 'chrisg.atroad.com'
alias: 'chrisg'
.... and on this work system mail to chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *does*
get delivered to me, I'll investigate!
--
Chris Green
