Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:42:37 +0530
Saurabh Bathe <sbathe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
AFAIK, edit the makefile for dosemu.
Thank you very much for your answer.
After doing the " rpmbuild --rebuild dosemu-1.4.0-1.src.rpm" step that errored
out as described in my previous message, I had a file named dosemu-1.4.0.tgz in
my ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES directory. I un-tarred that and after poking around a
bit I found a file named compiletime-settings. I changed the line in that file
that said libdir ${prefix}/lib to libdir ${prefix}/lib64
I then recreated dosemu-1.4.0.tgz in the ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES directory so it now
contained the modified compiletime-settings file. After that, doing a "rpm
-bb ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/dosemu.spec" created the file that I wanted,
dosemu-1.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm. I installed it and it appears to work as expected.
PERFORMANCE
This 64-bit DOSEMU compile runs substantially slower than the 32-bit compile
that I used previously on this computer. I have several rather large
PowerBASIC/DOS programs that are, in fact, the main reason why I use DOSEMU.
Up until a couple of days ago, I had Fedora 7/i386 on this computer. I just
happen to still have the numbers when compiling one of those programs with
PowerBASIC/DOS under DOSEMU:
With F7/i386: 1686600 lines per minute -- total time to compile the program:
0.2 seconds
With F8/x86_64: 230400 lines per minute -- total time to compile the program:
1.6 seconds.
The F8/x86_64 DOSEMU is running approximately 13 times slower.
I understand that DOSEMU has to do more work to run on a x86_64 architecture.
However, I'm wondering if there is something that I missed or something that I
should do (compiler options?) that would give it a bit more oomph.
Is freedos or drdos in xen or kvm an option? I expect they should work.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
Please do not reply off-list
