On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 19:08 +0100, Christoph Höger wrote: > Tim schrieb: > > Tim: > >>> But mine doesn't actually use them for activity status. They don't > >>> change when using wireless (i.e. there's no blinking during reception > >>> not transmission), and they don't change for network availability (it's > >>> lit if you've enabled your wireless hardware, whether or not their is > >>> another wireless device to connect to). > > > > Christoph Höger: > >> what hardware (and what driver) do you use? I saw this with iwl3945. > >> That is not very surprising as iwl3945 is still beta software. > > > > [tim@suspishus ~]$ /sbin/lspci | grep ireless > > 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02) > > > > It uses whatever driver it finds automatically, as came with the > > original installation. I've not added anything, it worked out of the > > box, so to speak. > > > > At least the networking works, even if the LED doesn't work > > properly. ;-) > > > > Well, then you have to wait for the intel developers to integrate the > led into their driver. I doubt that this is a very high priority target ;) > But it is funny that they incorporated it in to the Windows driver, but maybe that is because there are more Windows machines. -- ======================================================================= Your computer account is overdrawn. Please reauthorize. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
