On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 07:32 -0800, Serguei Miridonov wrote: > Hello, > > I have some remarks about Fedora lifetime and stability which > are very important for general users. Now and in the past > there were some issues with Fedora upgrades which turned life > into nightmare when instead of doing normal work users had to > fight with bugs, sending reports, waiting fixes, etc. > > I think that it might be a good idea to increase the time > between Fedora releases and/or make the lifetime of every > release at least 2-3 years. > > However, before starting a discussion about this I would like > to ask, if this topic was discussed earlier. I'm sure it was > but can somebody point me any deep analysis which really > proves that current one year lifetime and half-year release > period is the best for Fedora? > > Thank you in advance. > > Serguei. > No deep analysis required: Short term support (1 year), bleeding edge: Fedora. Long term support (7 years), slow moving: RHEL (and CentOS). - Gilboa
