On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:09:06 +0000 Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nonetheless, to say that pdftk is EOL is weird - pdftk is actively > developed upstream, it's not EOL'd there. I'll re-raise this and try > to get pdftk unorphaned. That is really unfortunate. pdftk is one of the most-used utilities that I have on this computer. I wonder if the Livna guys would consider picking this up and adding it to their repository. Does anyone know someone who's involved with that lot? Perhaps a suggestion could be made.... -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
