on 10/31/2007 1:05 PM, Claude Jones wrote: > On Wednesday October 31 2007 11:47:05 am Paul Lemmons wrote: >> So, the statement of support for *production machines* used in >> the same breath as *Fedora* is simply a misuse of technology. > > In my view, you're view is nonsense. > It's your view, for your needs, and that's fine. > Why do you have a felt need to apply a blanket to the whole > community of users based on your perceived needs? > That's where you lost me. > > There's someone on this list who is running a cluster of 1000 > Fedora boxes in a production environment, as I recall, for a > government agency; why Fedora? As I recall, it had something to > do with a specific driver requirement, or something _like_ > that... There are others. I run two Fedora servers in a > production environment, myself. > > I could tend to agree with much of what you say until you get so > damn categorical - > > But, what this has to do with the ETA of F8, I'm not sure...you > just struck a nerve with that comment above. If I read it correctly the ETA of F8 is on schedule. Or was this morning. Whatever they were having a problem with has to be solved by tonight and they sounded hopeful. Otherwise? + one week. I think that you are going to like Fedora 8. -- David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
