TEST REPLY 2007/10/18, John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Craig White wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:41 -0400, Alfredo Perez wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I would like to have a fedora mailing list only for a server > >> installation type of issues. I went through the mailing list of fedora > >> and I don't see something close to that. > > ---- > > many of us would call that the CentOS list ;-) > > if it's not CentOS binaries (or maybe CentOS source) I wouldn't dare ask > there;-) > > For RHEL clones though, I am game to ask on the appropriate RHEL list, > making it clear it's -clone. > > I have previously irked some by describing Fedora as a rolling beta. I > stand by that, and I would not counsel its use on servers for anything > serious, like running your business. > > If you've informed yourself of the likelihood of an update fouling your > nest and you can live with that, then fine. Machines that matter most to > me run a RHEL-clone. > > RHEL can have the same sorts of problems, but it's far less likely. > > For those brave enough to run a Fedora server? It's still new > technology, I think it best to stay on the one list. > > OTOH if someone suggests a new list for each release of Fedora, I'm for > that:-) > > > > > -- > > Cheers > John > > -- spambait > 1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Please do not reply off-list > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- 石井一夫 日本Rubyの会 freeparis2@xxxxxxxxx http://officeparis.org/blog/
