Ed Greshko wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
I prefer to keep trying to educate them; if it keeps your inbox and mine
down, that's good. It won't stop everyone, I don't anticipate otherwise.
I detect a bit of contradiction....
Look for some irony. Nobody's paid to attend to these lists, and nobody
really expects to be paid.
You say "I prefer to keep trying to educate them" yet you post one line
responses of debatable value. And, you seem to have indicated that it is
lack of compensation as part of the issue. As in you don't get paid enough
to provide a complete and comprehensive response.
If someone's prepared to pay a decent sum of money, certainly they'll
get more of my attention. While I'm not being paid, then there's limits
to how much spoon feeding I'll do.
The particular one-liner that seems to have attracted your ire was in
fact preceded in another post by a (brief) outline of what is needed to
do the job properly, without NAT.
Certainly, your one line answer hasn't keep anyones inbox less cluttered.
But, I'll take responsibility for that. :-(
In any event...life goes on.
Don't open a soup kitchen. :-)
My waist says I eat too well!
Looking down on mine has convinced me that it is time to head out for a 35km
bike ride.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please do not reply off-list
