Re: 2.6.23 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Res wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Kevin Kofler wrote:

Res <res <at> ausics.net> writes:
Yes it takes time, on my tiny desktop of p4 2.4g with only a measy 1 gig
ram, it takes a whole 12 mintues to build and install, wow if you cant
drag yourself away from the pc for 12 pissy little minutes, you seriously
have problems
The time it needs depends on the number of modules you pick (and the 
time you
spend configuring to select exactly the modules you need is _your_ 
time, not
So you don't copy over your '.config'? you spend 30 minutes each time 
re-inventing your wheel :) maybe you should be vanished back to winblows 
then, as you seem to like bloated vendor OS's/kernels you'll be right at 
home, then again, many people now days say Raleigh is Redmond so what 
does it matter.
Have you evaluated your savings in compiling your own kernel? Vendors' 
kernels may be comprehensive, but I doubt that they actually use more 
RAM than a self-compiled one does.
My concern with building a kernel that's significantly different from 
the vendors' is that vendors' scripts make some assumptions, such as 
that one uses modules, such as that certain modules are available.
I will build a kernel if I must, but I prefer to use vendors' source 
where possible.
This is no place for rudeness, and it's wrong to assume everyone's 
computer facilities are as well-endowed as one's own.

--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Please do not reply off-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux