On 10/13/07, Karl Larsen <k5di@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thomas Cameron wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 05:38 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote: > > > > > >>> That's called coincidence, not proof. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I think your trying to protect SELinux. I don't know why. > >> > > > > No, it's pointing out the obvious. The issue you had was NOT - repeat > > NOT - an issue with SELinux. > > > > A lot of people a lot smarter than you have said so, you bring NO proof > > to the list, just supposition based on coincidence. > > > > I've tried to be polite to you out of respect to my elders, but you are > > just full of shit and won't listen to folks who know a bunch more than > > you do. > > > > Get this through your head: Your issues are NOT due to SELinux. I > > don't know what you did, but you are the kind of user that sysadmins > > HATE because you go in and jack up your system and then blame the system > > or the admin. > > > > Listen to those who know more than you do, OK? > > > > Thomas > > > > > Listen you fat head jerk! You brought nothing but your gut feeling > that SELinux can't be the cause period. > > Well your almost right. But you have no idea why. You do not know > why your right. Or what that means. I will not turn SELinux back on > until a Bug is fixed in F7 8-) Yup, officially time to add you to my block list. Have a nice life. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
