2007/10/9, Andrew Parker <andrewparker@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 10/9/07, antonio montagnani <antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2007/10/9, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > antonio montagnani wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with you, I am running F8T3 in my office (not IT office) and I > > > > am comparing with F7 that are running similar tasks (and I would say > > > > F8T3 is satisfactory at the moment). > > > > > > > > And in my opinion when I started running F8T3, NM was a problem, not > > > > real bugs but I understood that some problems were connected to > > > > programmer's choice. > > > > > > Then the programmer's choice are resulting in unexpected behavior which > > > can be considered as bugs. If you find things not working as expected, > > > just file bug reports. > > > > > As stated by someone else, having TCP/IP fixed in particular for the > > Ethernet and DHCP's served for wireless is my choice. > > If also DHCP's served and fixed TCP/IP for wireless is planned, I > > would be happy. > > > > I speak on my experience, usually I connect by wire when at office, I > > connect wireless with fixed TCP/IP at home when I am in my garden, I > > use DHCP when at my friend's home and in the hotspots. > > > > Static IPs are required if you want your router to DNAT specific ports > to specific hosts. Gamers will typically want this. > > I am not a gamer, and when I connect my laptop I need to have fixed TCP/IP number, that was working in F7 and has some trouble in F8T3... it is not so important when I am on the move :-) -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag
