Re: The case against NetworkManager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The case against NetworkManager
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:19:35 +0530
In-reply-to: <4c37b6af0710090646r3cf4b746t653fd0d7977eb62a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <fefv9g$869$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c37b6af0710090630p54ef0ec3pd2ac8f4f851af141@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <470B8474.2000007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c37b6af0710090646r3cf4b746t653fd0d7977eb62a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)

antonio montagnani wrote:

I agree with you, I am running F8T3 in my office (not IT office) and I
am comparing with F7 that are running similar tasks (and I would say
F8T3 is satisfactory at the moment).

And in my opinion when I started running F8T3, NM was a problem, not
real bugs but I understood that some problems were connected to
programmer's choice.

Then the programmer's choice are resulting in unexpected behavior whichcan be considered as bugs. If you find things not working as expected,just file bug reports.


Rahul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: antonio montagnani

References:
- The case against NetworkManager
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: antonio montagnani
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: antonio montagnani

Prev by Date: Re: The case against NetworkManager
Next by Date: Re: Faulty wireless card?
Previous by thread: Re: The case against NetworkManager
Next by thread: Re: The case against NetworkManager
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]