Re: The case against NetworkManager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The case against NetworkManager
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:34:28 +0530
In-reply-to: <4c37b6af0710090658vd367361w12795629c763a378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <fefv9g$869$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c37b6af0710090630p54ef0ec3pd2ac8f4f851af141@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <470B8474.2000007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c37b6af0710090646r3cf4b746t653fd0d7977eb62a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <470B86EF.2030303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c37b6af0710090658vd367361w12795629c763a378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)

antonio montagnani wrote:


I speak on my experience, usually I connect by wire when at office, I
connect wireless with fixed TCP/IP at home when I am in my garden, I
use DHCP when at my friend's home and in the hotspots.

Is this the roadmap???


The roadmap is described in

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00125.html
http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerToDo

Rahul

References:
- The case against NetworkManager
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: antonio montagnani
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: antonio montagnani
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: The case against NetworkManager
  - From: antonio montagnani

Prev by Date: Re: Faulty wireless card?
Next by Date: Re: GPL
Previous by thread: Re: The case against NetworkManager
Next by thread: Re: The case against NetworkManager
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]