On Monday 24 September 2007 10:11:45 pm Mike McCarty wrote: > Chris Jones wrote: > >>Umm, I haven't lobbied for that. What I have lobbied for is the > >>ability to install or not. I haven't lobbied for removing it. > >>If you want to run SELinux, fine for you. I don't. I don't want > >>it on my machine. So far, RH has provided tools which only know > >>how to install a version of Linux which has SELinux in it. I'd > >>like the option NOT to install it, and have it not be on my > >>machine. > > > > There is. Its call Ubuntu... > > I found this statement suspect, at least, since Debian > has had SELinux in it for some time, and AIUI Ubuntu is > a Debian derivative. I looked, and Ubuntu has SELinux. I may be wrong but I thought you have to go out of you way to have SELinux with ubuntu, its not there in a default install. Even if it is, replace Ubuntu with "Any-distro-without-SELinux" and my argument still stands. > I got an employment contract, and the people I contracted > for wanted that I be able to boot WinXP and Fedora. So, > I have a machine which is dual boot WinXP and FC2. > > On my own, I wouldn't have chosen Fedora. > On my own, I wouldn't have chosen WinXP. > > Given that I have the machine, and it is dual boot WinXP/FC2, > it remains that way. When the time comes that I feel I really > must install something newer, it won't be Fedora. > > In the meantime, I remain a Fedora User. Any company that ties itself to FC2 is not one I wish to have dealings with. If there aren't aware of the potential problems involved in running that OS then I question their competence. Chris
